Introduction to Social Contract Theory
Social
Contract Theory
Concept
The
social contract theory is a most important theory of the state. According to
this theory the origin of the state is the result of the agreement by the
people voluntary to form a civilized society. This theory implies two things, first
it seeks to explain the origin of state, it attempt to define the relationship
between the rulers and rule. Thus, it is a theory both about the origin and
nature of state.
The
social contract theory tells us that in early society people lived in a state
of nature but there was no law and authority to safe guard the life and liberty
of the people. Hence they suffered a great cause and hardship in the state of
nature as a result. The primitive people gave up the state of the nature and
made a contract among them in other to escape from those problems and suffering
which result the formation of state.
The
chief exponents regarding the origin of state are Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau.
The views presented by them can be analyzed into two headings:
1. State of nature
2. Social contract
According to Locke
State
of Nature
In
the state of nature lived or free and happy life. They also enjoyed the rights
and freedom. But it was pre-political. Man was not quarrelsome, brutal and
selfish. They were sympathetic towards other’s fellow men. The state of nature
was “the state of equality and reason” rather than license. There was a state
of peace, good well, mutual assistance and preservation.
But
there were no definite and determinant laws. There was no competent authority
to execute the laws, no independent and impartial arbitrator to settle the
disputes.
Social contract
The
inconvenient condition was created only due to the condition of
disorganization. So, in order to escape from inconvenient situation people
abandoned the state of nature. They enter into an agreement with each other
with one another to form a civilized society. There are two contract in Locke’s
theory
a)
Social
contract
b)
Government
contract
According to Hobbes
State
of Nature
Might is right was
the main ethics in Hobbes’s state of nature. Man’s life was miserable. In the
state of nature men were selfish and aggressive. They were always quarreling
with one another. There was no peace and security in the state of nature. Every
man was enemy to other.
To him, “men’s
condition was solitary, nasty, brutish and short.” The weak people have no
chance to survive.
Social
Contract
Men meet together and
inter into an agreement in order to have good and permanent end to superiority
among the people. The people make up their mind to form a state through a
voluntary contract. And they agreed to surrender their natural right to
superior person or groups of person to whom they ought their allegiance. The
contract was each man with all and all with each.
Every man said to
every order other I authorize and give up of my rights giving myself to this
man or group of man on this condition that thou give up the right to him and
authorized all his actions in right manner.
According to Rousseau
State
of Nature
The state of nature
according to Rousseau was very good. There was perfect freedom and equality.
Men were noble savages and they experienced idea happiness. Every man was kind
and sympathetic towards his fellowmen people. They were away from the notion of
vice.
But this state of nature did not
continued for long time. The growth of population and size of private property
were responsible for inequality and unhappiness among the people of nature of
state.
Social
contract
The solution of
problem was found in a contract and the formation of the state or the civilize
society. In other words each person made contract with all and all with each,
as a result all the men dependent upon each and each dependent up all.
In brief, each man
was under the control of entire community. There was only one contract in
Rousseau’s social contract theory. Each man lost his happiness as soon as he
made a social contract.
From above
discussion, it is clear that the ancient people who were living in the state of
nature and they coming to the contract or agreement with a view to form
civilized society. On which all the three experts are agreed secondly, this
philosopher opinion that the state originated as a result of the contract made
by the people to escape from the inconveniences of the state of nature.
Though they varies in
other aspect like the condition of the state or the nature or the people and
their habits, living styles etc.
Comments
Post a Comment